From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon book. Happy reading From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon Pocket Guide.

To learn more, view our Privacy Policy.

Content Metrics

Log In Sign Up. Translated by Wayne Coppins. Waco: Baylor University Press, The Two Cities Blog. August 9, Jesse Nickel. The volume comprises a collection of sixteen independently-written essays united by their focus on early Christian history and the formation of the New Testament canon. The volume is divided into four parts. This involved a lengthy developmental process, with several factors impacting the gradual shaping — and then preservation — of Christian identity. The canonical meaning of a text which it possesses as part of an established group of texts cannot be equated to its historical function.

Both must be understood and considered independently. From Jesus to the New Testament is exciting and challenging, a thorough and intellectually-sophisticated work of NT scholarship. Instead, he offers a nuanced presentation of how these elements of NT study can be understood — and indeed affirmed — within the methodology of the science of history.

  • Vive le Vegan!: Simple, Delectable Recipes for the Everyday Vegan Family;
  • Soil Mechanics Laboratory Manual?
  • New Perspectives on Nitrogen Cycling in the Temperate and Tropical Americas: Report of the International SCOPE Nitrogen Project?
  • Account Options.
  • The use and origin of the (Old and) New Testament as Christianity's canon.

For all others interested in historical-critical NT scholarship, the NT and history, or canonical studies, this book is highly recommended. An excellent example of thorough and technical biblical scholarship, this work offers great insight into various facets of the NT texts, both individually and as a unified whole.

Related Papers. By Ryder Wishart. Lactantius, a third—fourth century Christian author wrote in his early-fourth-century Latin Institutiones Divinae Divine Institutes :. But all scripture is divided into two Testaments. That which preceded the advent and passion of Christ—that is, the law and the prophets —is called the Old; but those things which were written after His resurrection are named the New Testament. The Jews make use of the Old, we of the New: but yet they are not discordant, for the New is the fulfilling of the Old, and in both there is the same testator The majority of Christian denominations have settled on the same book canon.

It consists of the four narratives of Jesus Christ's ministry, called " Gospels "; a narrative of the apostles ' ministries in the early church called the Book of Acts ; 21 early letters, commonly called "epistles," written by various authors and consisting mostly of Christian counsel and instruction; and a book of apocalyptic prophecy known as the Book of Revelation. Each of the Gospels narrates the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. None of the Gospels originally had an author's name associated with it, but each has been an assigned an author according to tradition.

Modern scholarship differs on precisely by whom, when, or in what original form the various gospels were written. The first three are commonly classified as the synoptic Gospels.

  • The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta: The Persian Challenge?
  • The Formation of the New Testament Canon!
  • The Lost Empire of Atlantis: Historys Greatest Mystery Revealed?
  • Mahabharata Book Eight: Karna, Volume One (Clay Sanskrit Library).

They contain very similar accounts of events in Jesus' life, although differing in some respects. The Gospel of John stands apart for its unique records of several miracles and sayings of Jesus not found elsewhere. Its timeline of Jesus' ministry also differs significantly from the other Gospels, and its theological outlook is also unique. The Book of Acts , also occasionally termed Acts of the Apostles or Acts of the Holy Spirit , is a narrative of the apostles' ministry after Christ's death. It is also a sequel to the third Gospel of Luke , written by the same author. The book traces the events of the early Christian church—with the apostles Peter and Paul as the main characters—from shortly after Jesus' resurrection, through the church's spread from Jerusalem into the Gentile world, until shortly before the trial and execution of Saint Paul in Rome.

The Pauline epistles constitute those letters traditionally attributed to Paul , though his authorship of some of them is disputed.

Scripture :: The Canon of Scripture

One such letter, Hebrews, is nearly universally agreed to be by someone other than Paul. The so-called Pastoral Epistles—1 and 2 Timothy and Titus—are thought by many modern scholars to have been written by a later author in Paul's name. The General or "Catholic" Epistles are those written to the church at large by various writers.

Catholic in this sense simply means universal. The book is also called the Apocalypse of John. It consists primarily of a channeled message from Jesus to seven Christian churches, together with John's dramatic vision of the Last Days, the Second Coming of Christ, and the Final Judgment. In ancient times there were dozens or even hundreds of Christian writings which were considered authoritative by some, but not all, ancient churches. These were not ultimately included in the book New Testament canon.

These works are considered "apocryphal," and are therefore referred to as the New Testament Apocrypha. Some were deemed by the orthodox churches to be heretical, while others were considered spiritually edifying but not early enough to be included, of dubious authorship, or controversial theologically even if not heretical.

The New Testament is a collection of works, and as such was written by multiple authors. The traditional view is that all the books were written by apostles e.

These traditional ascriptions have been rejected by some church authorities as early as the second century, however. In modern times, with the rise of rigorous historical inquiry and textual criticism , the apostolic origin of many of the New Testament books has been called into serious question.

Jens Schröter, From Jesus to the New Testament | German for Neutestamentler

Seven of the epistles of Paul are now generally accepted by most modern scholars as authentic. Opinion about the Epistle to the Colossians and Second Thessalonians is divided. Most critical scholars doubt that Paul wrote the other letters attributed to him. Modern conservative Christian scholars tend to be more willing to accept the traditional ascriptions. However, few serious scholars, Christian or otherwise, still hold that Paul wrote the Letter to the Hebrews. The authorship of all non-Pauline New Testament books has been disputed in recent times.

How Did the Early Christians View the Books of the Bible?

Ascriptions are largely polarized between conservative Christian and liberal Christian as well as non-Christian experts, making any sort of scholarly consensus all but impossible. The traditional view—also supported by a minority of critical scholars—supposes that Matthew was written first, and Mark and Luke drew from it. A smaller group of scholars espouse Lukan priority. The dominant view among critical scholars—the Two-Source Hypothesis—is that the Gospel of Mark was written first, and both Matthew and Luke drew significantly upon Mark and another common source, known as the "Q Source" , from Quelle, the German word for "source.

The Gospel of John is thought by traditional Christians to have been written by John, the son of Zebedee. He is also referred to as "the Beloved Disciple," and is particularly important in the Eastern Orthodox tradition.

Gifting Information

Critical scholarship often takes the view that John's Gospel is the product of a community including formerly Jewish Christians in the late first or early second century, who had been expelled from the Jewish community because of their insistence on the divinity of Jesus and other theological views, which caused them to take an adversarial attitude toward "the Jews.

Views about the authors of the other New Testament works—such as the letters purportedly from such figures such as Peter, James, John, and Jude—fall along similar lines. Traditionalists tend to accept the designations as they have been received, while critical scholars often challenge these notions, seeing the works as mistakenly attributed to apostles, or in some case as being "pious forgeries," written in an apostle's name but not actually authored by him.

According to tradition, the earliest of the books were the letters of Paul, and the last books to be written are those attributed to John, who is traditionally said to have been the youngest of the apostles and to have lived to a very old age. Irenaeus of Lyons , c. Evangelical and traditionalist scholars generally support this dating. Most critical scholars agree that Paul's letters were the earliest to be written, while doubting that some of the "late" Pauline letters such as Ephesians and Timothy were actually written by Paul.

For the Gospels, they tend to date Mark no earlier than 65 and no later than Matthew is dated between 70 and Luke is usually placed within 80 to John's Gospel is the subject of more debate, being dated as early as 85 and as late as the early second century. All Christian groups respect the New Testament, but they differ in their understanding of the nature, extent, and relevance of its authority. Views of the authoritativeness of the New Testament often depend on the concept of inspiration, which relates to the role of God in the formation of both the New Testament and the Old Testament.

The meaning of all of these concepts depend on the supposition that the text of Bible has been properly interpreted, with consideration for the intention of the text, whether literal history, allegory or poetry, etc. Related to the question of authority is the issue of which books were included in the New Testament: canonization.

Here, as with the writing of the texts themselves, the question is related to how directly one believes God or the Holy Spirit was involved in the canonization process. Contrary to popular misconception, the New Testament canon was not decided primarily by large Church council meetings, but rather developed slowly over several centuries.

Formal councils and declarations were also involved, however.